Thursday, December 19, 2019

Causes of the Second Punic War - 1722 Words

WORD COUNT: 1650 The two biggest powers of the Mediterranean where always destined to come head to head once again after the First Punic War (264 to 241 BC). There was no clear victor and the terms set by the Romans were extremely harsh. Even though the main cause of the second war was the war on Saguntum you must go back all the way to the ending of the First War. The war on Saguntum was seen by Polybius to be just the first incident in the war. In this essay I will look into the causes of the Second Punic War with the intention of backing up Polybius argument that the war on Saguntum was just the first incident and not a cause as Livy views it. I will be doing this with close analysis of our ancient sources. Three main causes will be†¦show more content†¦All this plus having to give up more than one piece of land was a huge blow to Carthaginian pride. As Livy put it; â€Å"mutual hatred was hardly less sharp a weapon than the sword† in the led up to war. This just helps to reinforce the argument that war was unavoidable one way or another and therefore the war on Saguntum was just an incident which led to a war which would eventually decide the dominant power in the Mediterranean. The success the Barca family had in the Spanish Peninsula was another huge factor which contributed to the war. It affected both Rome and Carthage. We must first look into what caused the expansion of Carthage into the Spanish Peninsula. When Hamilcar Barca had to give up Sicily and Sardinia he took a huge blow to his pride. And as Livy mentions â€Å"he was a proud man† and therefore the taking of Sicily which â€Å"had been surrendered too soon† and the fact that he was tricked into giving up Sardinia made Hamilcar determined to something about it. The Punic population also felt the same way as Hamilcar did towards the Romans. They despised the â€Å"tyrannical attitude of their conquerors† and therefore there was hardly any dispute when they had to decide whether to go to war or not. After the First Punic War, Hamilcar went to Spain with the purpose of building a power base to use against Rome. Not in order to be able pay their debts back as he told the Rom ans. Livy states that Carthage expansion in Spain was just a step in HamilcarShow MoreRelatedThe Punic Wars973 Words   |  4 PagesThe Punic Wars were made of three major wars. The last war was kind of a punishment for Carthage from Rome. The two powers in these wars were Rome and Carthage. Rome was controlling the main peninsula of Italy while Carthage was controlling the islands and trade of the Mediterranean. Rome and Carthage were once on a friendly term until things went south well. The Punic Wars have major historical content that involve both leaders on opposite side as well as the battles among the two city-states. TheseRead MoreTo What Extent Was Rome Responsible for the Punic Wars? Essay1045 Words   |  5 PagesThe responsibility for the Punic wars greatly shifts from one to the next as both Rome and Carthage were Superpowers in their own right and it was inevitable that there would be a collision and subsequent reaction from any action taken. This exhausting conflict was, according to Caven, a ‘contest in three rounds’ in which the Romans fought first for control of Sicily, then for the leadership of the western Mediterranean and finally to determine the survival or extinction of Carthage. By 270Read MoreThe Battle Between Carthage And Rome1728 Words   |  7 PagesThe three Punic Wars was a series of battles fought between Carthage and Rome that lasted almost a century from 264 BC to 149 BC. As Carthage had the leading power of Western Mediterranean and Rome’s control over the peninsula of Italy. However, both of the two states had different intensions over the island of Sicily leading to the battles of the Punic Wars that soon later ended in a total defeat for Carthage. With the desire of controlling the island of Sicily, Carthage would still have the dominanceRead MoreHannibal: Africa’s Tactical Genius Essay1202 Words   |  5 PagesHannibal was a Punic Carthaginian military commander, reputed to be one of the greatest in history and even a better tactician. Hannibal lived in a time of great friction in the Mediterranean where the Roman Republic dominated Macedon, Syracuse and the Seleucid Empire. He was a notable member of the Barca family, a noble family well known for being staunch antagonists of the Roman Republic. His father Hamilcar was a leading commander in the First Punic War, his brother-in-laws were Hasdrubal theRead MoreThe Classical Romans And The Roman Civilization1202 Words   |  5 Pagesdangerous enemy because they had plenty of wealth and they thought that Carthage was going to grow so that led to the First Punic War (264-241 BC). The Romans were victorious in this war over Sicily and that meant that they would have much manpower and wealth. Since they ruled Sicily now they shared an alliance with Spain and they controlled the Mediterranean trade. The Second Punic War (218-201BC) was when Hannibal ruled Carthage and they won against the Romans. Hannibal ended up making alliances withRead MoreEssay about Hannibal of Carthage602 Words   |  3 Pages Hannibals training as a military leader began at the age of nine when he went to Spain to be with his father. At Hamilcars request Hannibal pledged an oath of ha te towards the Roman Empire because of Carthages lost to the Romans in the First Punic War (261-241 BC). After Hamilcars death in 228 BC, Hannibals brother in law, Hasdrubal, assumed command of the Carthaginian Army. Seven years, in 221BC, Hasdrubal was assassinated. In those years, during Hasdrubals command, Hannibal was the main officerRead MoreThe And Soil By Ben Kiernan1305 Words   |  6 Pagespaper are from the book Blood and Soil by Ben Kiernan. Ancient Sparta was one of the major Greek city-states in ancient Greece. Sparta’s â€Å"uniquely military society,† in the words of historian Paul Cartledge, was a â€Å"conquest-state,† a â€Å"workshop of war.† (Kiernan, 45). It was not the normal Greek city-state and focused mostly on its military power. â€Å"It is believed that Sparta’s quest for expansion began in the eighteenth century B.C.E, with the conquest and annihilation of Aigys a town in its ownRead MoreThe Treatment of Threats923 Words   |  4 Pagesthen] entered into three wars with the Carthaginians† (text, 262). These three wars were known as the Punic Wars. The first one was primarily a naval battle and Rome ended up winning because they converted naval warfare into mini-land battles by jumping ship once they had rammed the Carthaginians. After being victorious, the Romans forced the Carthaginians to sign a treaty giving up Sicily and saying they would pay â€Å"indemn ities† (Dr. Kaz, lecture, 3-27-14). The Second Punic War was very different. TheRead MoreExplain The Economic Logic Underpinning Mahan’S Theory1104 Words   |  5 PagesRoman Empire, which included the history of the Second Punic War, Mahan emphasized the significant role that sea communications played in Rome’s victory. Additionally, he describes the relevance of different maritime campaigns in various battles that took place during the French and American revolutions. Mahan evaluates these wars from an uncommon perspective to demonstrate the how sea control and naval powers were the most crucial components in these wars outcomes. He institutes sea power as beingRead MoreThe Battle Of The Punic Wars3659 Words   |  15 PagesIntroduction The Punic Wars were a defining moment in the expansion of the Roman Republic, with the Second Punic War (218 – 201 BC (Grant, 1960)) playing the part of a corner stone in the bridge to create the powerful Roman Empire. Moreover, this was the first time that Rome had expanded into territories outside of Italy which was pivotal in the development of the Roman Republic, and furthermore the Rome Empire, as it marks the beginning of an imperial Roman power (Rickard, 2001). Accordingly, this war has captured

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.